Contenuto Principale
“Denunciata” Ruth Halperin Kaddari, femminista CEDAW all’ONU. PDF Stampa E-mail
Sabato 30 Giugno 2012 00:00

Ruth Halperin Kaddari, membro del CEDAW all’Onu, denunciata per istigazione all’odio di genere

La Coalizione per i Bambini e le Famiglie ha presentato una richiesta di impeachment contro una delle femministe che usano l’ONU (comitato CEDAW) per imporre il femminismo radicale contro i diritti di uomini e bambini.

La richiesta di impeachment riguarda in massima parte prese di posizioni pubbliche, non fatti per cui potrebbero mancare prove.

Confidiamo che la Coalizione per i Bambini e le Famiglie abbia descritto le cose come stanno.


Questo il testo della denuncia

«Incitamento dall’odio.
è una delle più vocali oppositrici dell’affido condiviso.
Attivamente invita ad a usare i bambini per estorcere denaro dai padri. [...]
Non ha problemi ad invitare le donne ad impedire i contatti con i papà come ricatto per ottenere più mantenimenti.
Sostiene che il matrimonio è oppressione contro le donne che devono divorziare per “ottenere potere” e godere dei mantenimenti degli ex. [...]

Ha passato la linea che demarca l’eliminare le discriminazioni contro le donne e scatenare una guerra per eliminare gli uomini. [...]
Incoraggia le donne a fare false accuse di violenza domestica.

Il CEDAW deve servire a raggiungere l’eguaglianza, o essere usato come piattaforma per imporre il femminismo radicale? [...]

Per il bene di decine di migliaia di bambini privati dei loro papà, che questa femminista conta come “vittorie”, vi chiediamo di porre termine al suo incarico.»

Il testo in inglese della denuncia tratta da

CEDAW Remove Ruth Halperin Kaddari











December 22, 2011
To The Honorable Ms. Rashida Manjoo
THE SPECIAL RAPPORTEUR ON VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN, OFFICEOF THE HIGH COMMISSIONER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS,OHCHR-UNOG, 1211 GENEVA 10, SWITZERLANDFax: + 41-22-917-9006, e-mail: Questo indirizzo e-mail è protetto dallo spam bot. Abilita Javascript per vederlo.
Re: Removal of Ruth Halperin Kaddari (ISRAEL)from UN Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against WomenDear Ms. Manjoo, and members of the CEDAW Committee,The men’s rights organizations in Israel wish to bring to your attention outrageousconduct of one of the members of the U.N. Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women, Dr. Ruth Halperin-Kaddari. While this memberenjoys prestige for work to eliminate discrimination against womeninternationally, not much is known outside Israel that this member is not workingto “eliminate discrimination”, rather she is devoted to a ruthless crusade toemasculate the male gender in Israel, ridicule men, perpetuate sex basedstereotypes, disengage fathers from their children, reduce fathers to a role of visitors one hour a week, educate social workers how to torment fathers seekingaccess to their children, supply social workers tools and language that can be usedto reduce or minimize father-child access, and in particular she is one of the mostvocal opponents of joint custody and parental equality. She actively advocatesusing the children to extort money from fathers. These are not the values of CEDAW.In fact, Ms. Halperin-Kaddari uses the plentiful resources of an academicInstitution, Rackman Center, to launch libelous and hate filled campaigns againstmen, with the ultimate goal of perpetuating the statutory and almost automatic“tender years”
presumption (Section 25, Guardian and Capacity Law), which giveswomen automatic custody. In fact Ms. Halperin-Kaddari
stated that automaticcustody to women should be extended from the age of 6 until the age of 18. Ms.Halperin-Kaddari appears on television and states that men don’t really want tosee their children, and that they can easily forget their own children. She has no problems calling women to withhold visitations as bargaining chips to get higherchild support, and she indeed admits that women should use children to extortmoney from their fathers. She associates herself with other women who advocatethat marriage is oppressive to women, and that women should break up marriages,to “empower themselves” and enjoy self fulfillment as single moms with childrenrelying on the former spouse’s income and assets. At this point, she expectswomen to sit at home and simply collect child support from men.If that is not enough, Ms. Halperin-Kaddari advocates the idea that children belongwith the physical and mental primary caretaker. She expresses views in everypossible forum that Courts should delve into mundane questions such as whocooked for the children, or who did the laundry, regardless of the question of whobrought the money for the cooking or the laundry machine. This perpetuatesstereotypes of women as stay-at-home homemakers, and men as work mules, andthese are the stereotypes she expects judges at family court to obsess about. Thesedays in Israel, she introduces ideas, never recognized in any sane country, thatchildren belong with the mental caretaker, based on theories that children mentallyconnect to mothers and not fathers.Ms. Halperin-Kaddari incites hatred among the Israeli public. Certainly such aperson with such primitive ideation should not be telling women in Kenya orMorocco how to “empower themselves” via creation of parental alienation, andplying children up for financial extortion.In fact, as a member of the Committee in charge of elimination of stereotypes andfull equality, her actions and personal views are directly in contrast with theCEDAW convention and all other United Nations human rights treaties, U.N.material, model practices and cultural norms, all of them support joint custody andequal, maximized access.Ms. Halperin-Kaddari has crossed the line between elimination of discriminationagainst women, and waging a war to eliminate men altogether.One can understand a zealous fight in a jurisdiction where women are oppressedor being discriminated against. That is not the case in Israel, despite the contrivedefforts of Ms. Halperin-Kaddari to present Israel as an oppressive country forwomen. The facts are that Israel is a sua generispro-women jurisdiction like no other :
(a) In custody women get the benefit of an ancient presumption of tender yearsup to the age of 6.
(b) De facto, women always get interim custody of all children.
(c) We are not aware of one case where interim custody was awarded to bothparents.
(d) Men have no tights to visitations. A social worker is appointed to examinethe father (much like a personal criminal probation officer), and the fathermust beg the social worker for the grace of being allowed some access withthe children.
(e) A quarter of men in divorce get not more than one hour a week withchildren in supervised “contact centers”, which are operated at securitylevels resembling jails.
(f) Women have the power to compel the men to see the children in contactcenters solely by refusing visitations, and telling the social worker that theydo not communicate well with the former spouse.
(g) Women are exempt from paying child support, even if finally custody shiftsto the father.
(h) Women’s income is ignored for purposes of calculating child support. It ispurely a father’s duty.
(i) Child support awards against fathers are entirely garnishable, leaving noself support reserve to men.
(j) By Attorney General Guideline 2.5, women are exempt from false domesticviolence complaint. Halperin-Kaddari’s own clinic encourages women tofile false DV complaints.
(k) Because of the doctrine of imputed income, child support awards againstmen have no correlation to actual disposable income. Some men must pay80%, 100% and even 200% and 250% of their income as child support…
(l) Police does not register complaints of men against women for provocationand actual assaults.
(m) Family Courts do not conduct trials. A custody judgment can be issued exparte without evidence, solely when a Judge fees like it (See J. Tova Sivan,Ramat Gan family Court).
(n) Radical feminists who admit to vigorously hating men, and wishing to“revenge” against men, are routinely appointed as family court judges(Rivka Mekayes, Tamar Snunit Forer, Varda Ben Shahar, Anat Elfasi,Tzila Tzfat, Tzila Kenan, Alisa Miller, Tova Sivan, and the list goes on).
(o) The State’s Legal aid is Israel gives women free legal services withoutexamining income of the women at all. Conversely, men without financialwherewithal are denied legal aid services, either by laconic denials, falseclaims that the paperwork was lost, false claims of lack of merit, and amyriad of other excuses.
(p) Women almost always collect attorney fees in family court ($2,000 for thecustody, $2,000 for the child support, and much more for equitabledistributions). Because women always win in family courts, men musteither accept every extortionist demand of the woman, or pay $10,000 upto $165,000 in legal fees, and then get slapped with Court fees.
Woman can file libel and “invasion of privacy’ claims against their ownspouses and win $15,000 per “insult”. No man has ever been successful onsame.
(r) Gag orders prevent men from exposing corruption and tell their stories.
(s) At Rabbinical courts women can sue and recover compensation for amarriage deed (Ktuba), even though the act is symbolic.
(t) At Rabbinical court, women can prevent joint marital property from beingdistributed by getting exclusive occupancy until the smallest child is 18.
(u) Women can get ex parte orders simply for the asking.
(v) Women can enjoin their former spouses’ right to exit Israel for decades (nèexeat injunctions).
(w) Any application benefitting women is instantly decided,. When a manmakes a motion benefitting him, the judges would procrastinate for severalmonths, if not more.
(x)Applications to summon witnesses is made by women are automaticallygranted. If made by men, they are denied with sanctions.
(y) The Parliament itself has a Committee for the Advancement of the Status of Women, which is more or less the alter ego of Ruth Halperin Kaddari.Every Bill to amend laws to hurt and damage men, which is drafted atHalperin Kaddari’s center, is immediately passed on the Parliament(“Knesset”) for deliberations in the presence of powerful womenorganizations, heavily funded by the State, and no men’s rightsorganizations are invited.
(z) Almost half of suicides in Israel are committed by divorced fathers (200 outof 400). Only 5 divorced women commit suicide.Given this climate of discrimination against men, it is hard to understand what“elimination of discrimination against women”, Halperin-Kaddari is fighting for,when the women she represents already have every conceivable preferentialtreatment at courts, welfare service, police and the parliament. Halperin-Kaddariis simply inciting for hatred of men, and she does so relentlessly, and heartlessly.Such a woman-warrior cannot genuinely serve as an example as to how the fightto “eliminate discrimination against women” should look like. It should not be ascortched earth campaign, coupled with almost daily hate propaganda, andelevation of parental alienation to a form of cherished feministic ritual.In fact, CEDAW only authorizes elimination of discrimination to bring women tolevels at par with men. Israel is a rare example, where the fight to equalize womenhas reached a point where men are being tormented arrested, treated cruelly andunfairly, well beyond the spirit and letter of CEDAW. The question is, when doesthis male hating and war mongering about to end? Isn’t it enough to simply reachthe point of equality and equal opportunities, or should CEDAW be used as aplatform to spread radical feminist ideas?Ms. Halperin Kaddari certainly does not share the values of CEDAW. She is afeminist warrior in a land where all male targets were conquered, yet she continuesrelentlessly in her actions, while she enjoys the prestige as a UN expert, and thatprestige serves her to justify the continuation of her brutal onslaught against Israelimen and children.Wherefore, CEDAW members are kindly requested to terminate the appointmentof Ms. Ruth Halperin Kaddari, for the sake of tens of thousands fatherless Israelichildren, who are Halperin-Kaddari counts as “victories”. Alternatively, arapporteur is more than welcome in Israel to hear and report from field.
Respectfully,The Coalition for Children & Family (Israel)

JavaScript disabilitato!
Per visualizzare il contenuto devi abilitare il JavaScript dalle opzioni del tuo browser.

Ricerca / Colonna destra

Ho perso 15 Kg con questa tisana...


Utenti online

 87 visitatori online

Potrebbe interessarti anche

Rassegna Stampa

Rassegna Stampa


Viaggi Viaggi Viaggi


Moda Moda Moda


Musica, Film, Spettacoli